Partisan Gerrymandering Cases in State Supreme Courts in the 2020s Redistricting Round
Jonathan R. Cervas, Bernard Grofman, Scott Matsuda, and Justine Kawa. Albany Law Review 87, no. 4, 2024.
Read the article →
Jonathan R. Cervas, Bernard Grofman, Scott Matsuda, and Justine Kawa. “Partisan Gerrymandering Cases in State Supreme Courts in the 2020s Redistricting Round.” Albany Law Review 87, no. 4, 2024. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4617664
@article{cervas2024partisan, author={Jonathan R. Cervas and Bernard Grofman and Scott Matsuda and Justine Kawa}, title={Partisan Gerrymandering Cases in State Supreme Courts in the 2020s Redistricting Round}, journal={Albany Law Review 87, no. 4}, year={2024}, url={https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4617664} }
Summary
Reviews how state supreme courts handled partisan-gerrymandering claims during the 2020s redistricting round, examining the doctrines and evidentiary standards different states adopted after the federal courts closed the door on partisan-gerrymandering claims.